Québec, QC · POP — · EMP 424,230 · DATA GRADE A

Québec, QC

54.4 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#3 of 41

more exposed than 95% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

29.5%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

95.7%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Administrative officers 11,015 —
82.9
Administrative assistants 9,540 —
94.9
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 12,295 —
61.7
Information systems specialists 6,335 —
93.4
Retail and wholesale trade managers 6,280 —
68.2
Early childhood educators and assistants 9,835 —
39.8
Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses 8,815 —
43.3
Financial auditors and accountants 4,635 —
81.1
Cashiers 8,225 —
41.9
College and other vocational instructors 4,005 —
71.4

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Québec against any other metro — side by side.